BPsite Forums
May 03, 2024, 10:56:01 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: BPSITE FOREVER!
 
   Home   Help Search Members Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Siege  (Read 8467 times)
Hyvry1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 329



View Profile WWW
« on: February 19, 2004, 12:46:13 AM »

The siege says it upgrades by 33.3% but it doesn't.
I log all my KOC stats in  an emulator that i use to help me calculatestuff for KOC.
Whilst upgrading my siege i noticed that my attack went up by 16.65% Instead of 33.3%.
I son't know whether fortification does this i will note it when i next upgrade.  It would be useful if you guys recorded your before and after SA or DA depending on what you upgrade, then calculate the percentage increase then post  it here.  I have a feeling the admins screwed up...
« Last Edit: February 19, 2004, 12:48:18 AM by Hyvry1 » Logged
Hatred.891
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 13


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 19, 2004, 12:47:40 AM »

Yeah I noticed that too, hopefully someone will bring it to their attention. Did you check it after attacking someone with Fortification, because that could of just brought down the %.
« Last Edit: February 19, 2004, 12:49:37 AM by Hatred.891 » Logged
Arkanor
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 801



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 19, 2004, 01:58:34 AM »

Fishing admins... but it wouldn't surprise me if you were right.
Logged

Being a good example is hard.  I’m trying to serve as a horrible warning instead.
Hyvry1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 329



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: February 19, 2004, 06:30:36 AM »

I am 100% sure i am right. I triple checked the calculation.
Logged
underruler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3984



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 19, 2004, 06:49:31 AM »

I wouldn't be surprised if they effed it up...

Oh...Arkanor...did you know we can say fuck in here now?
Logged

I like to eat, eat, eat, apples and and bananas.


http://www.toxin.org/cgi-bin/hugs.cgi?&HUG...hug=luvr_bunnie

[img]http://www.toxin.org/cgi-bin/count_hugs.cgi?hug=luv
nonskilled
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 33


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 19, 2004, 07:12:31 AM »

under yur a young lady u should say !@#$ its rude to say !@#$. . . but ya im new but seems admins arent on top of stuff lately from the talkings i hear in the alleys of kompton.
Logged
Everous
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1726



View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: February 19, 2004, 11:47:01 AM »

it modifies 33.whatever% of your unmodified bonuses, thus remove all bonuses from any previous siege and that should look closer
Logged
Hyvry1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 329



View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: February 19, 2004, 03:15:12 PM »

That would mean cannons is the same as flaming arrows.  If it removed it then gave 33.3%.  It would do this each time and no gain would occur which is untrue.  I clearly found that when i upgraded my siege it increased, i found that using my original SA and my new SA i calculated a 16.65% rise instead of a 33.3% rise.
« Last Edit: February 19, 2004, 03:25:03 PM by Hyvry1 » Logged
FragMaster1972
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2265



View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: February 19, 2004, 04:21:20 PM »

nonono--you misunderstand. say your SA with no upgrades is 100,000. with 1 upgrade it's 125,000 (25%). The next upgrade will get it up to 150,000--25% of your unmodified bonus.  
Logged

1 posts to [span style=\'font-size:30pt;line-height:100%\'][/s]BURSEG!!![/u][/size][/span][/b]
"If you ever find yourself on the side of the Majority, it's time to pause and reflect." -Mark Twain[/color]

Hyvry1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 329



View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: February 19, 2004, 07:14:31 PM »

That could explain it.  I will note the percentage change when i next upgrade then see if they match.  If it decreases then this means it is the unmodified amount.  
Logged
Arkanor
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 801



View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: February 20, 2004, 03:02:19 AM »

Quote
I wouldn't be surprised if they effed it up...

Oh...Arkanor...did you know we can say fuck in here now?
Actually.... I didn't.  But since you have alerted me to that fact... I assume the word fucktard is also usable?
Logged

Being a good example is hard.  I’m trying to serve as a horrible warning instead.
underruler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3984



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: February 20, 2004, 03:08:41 AM »

Arkanor don't ASSume...presume...oh yea...I found a way around that one Tongue

Yes fucktard is damn usable.
Logged

I like to eat, eat, eat, apples and and bananas.


http://www.toxin.org/cgi-bin/hugs.cgi?&HUG...hug=luvr_bunnie

[img]http://www.toxin.org/cgi-bin/count_hugs.cgi?hug=luv
Arkanor
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 801



View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: February 20, 2004, 03:18:17 AM »

I'm not sure I like the word order there.
« Last Edit: February 20, 2004, 03:19:19 AM by Arkanor » Logged

Being a good example is hard.  I’m trying to serve as a horrible warning instead.
underruler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3984



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: February 20, 2004, 03:59:06 AM »

Ok then

Yes, fucktard is damn usable.  Does that sound better?
Logged

I like to eat, eat, eat, apples and and bananas.


http://www.toxin.org/cgi-bin/hugs.cgi?&HUG...hug=luvr_bunnie

[img]http://www.toxin.org/cgi-bin/count_hugs.cgi?hug=luv
smi256
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2287



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: February 21, 2004, 04:25:34 AM »

keep things on topic in the TGA/KOC sections <_< .  leave this stuff in the Temple.... :huh:
dear god, that sounds sooo wrong... :miffed:

but anyhow... I upgraded, and the % seemed correct.  I got 0.332982792% (basically one third) increase.
each upgrade stacks, where X is the level of upgrade, and no upgrade equals zero; (X*33.33%+1) multiplier or 25% for fortification.
This reminds me of AD&D somehow…
« Last Edit: February 21, 2004, 04:26:47 AM by smi256 » Logged

*was here
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!