Title: Tolkien Post by: LadyofLight on September 14, 2003, 08:50:23 PM I don't know if Auron will let this topic stay, but there's been quite a bit of discussion of Tolkien in another topic called Farm Revolts and I thought it might be better to move the discussion here so that thread might be used for, I don't know, a discussion about Farm Revolts. Also, if they are seperated it might be easier to follow both conversations. So, here the topic is, and if Auron closes it because he thinks it's too out there, I do apologize to him for the inconvenience of putting up another useless topic that you have to close down, but I did think there was osme interest in the topic.
Lady of light Title: Tolkien Post by: Carenevaelvdelity on September 14, 2003, 09:01:56 PM I'll help you move the conversation. It would make much more sense here.
I've actually had this conversation with a good friend of mine who, as a hobby, analyzes the TotR series and discusses the books. She once mentioned to me that people have actually sung their own version of the songs and put them out on personnal websites and/or a downloading system like Kazaa. I'll see what I can find. Title: Tolkien Post by: Lord Lanair on September 14, 2003, 09:03:38 PM That would be cool! If you find the songs on Kazaa, please let us know! ;)
Title: Tolkien Post by: Rug on September 14, 2003, 09:08:03 PM Moved to Arts and Literature.
Title: Tolkien Post by: LadyofLight on September 14, 2003, 09:11:14 PM Oh, ok. Does that mean we won't be able to access it form the city anymore?
LadyofLight Title: Tolkien Post by: Lord Lanair on September 14, 2003, 09:22:31 PM Well... we can for now, but the link will disapepar eventually. ;)
Maybe you should create a new thread in the City explaining where the old one went! LOL Title: Tolkien Post by: Attackus on September 14, 2003, 09:55:06 PM Just borrowed The Silmarillion today...started reading it and it is INCREDIBLE!! :D I've read the trilogy, but I think that this is almost better...:rolleyes:
-A Title: Tolkien Post by: Rug on September 14, 2003, 09:56:06 PM The link in the city will remain until its deleted.
Title: Tolkien Post by: LadyofLight on September 14, 2003, 10:09:55 PM Quote Just borrowed The Silmarillion today...started reading it and it is INCREDIBLE!! I've read the trilogy, but I think that this is almost better... I feel the same way. I absolutely love it. This was Tolkien's first love. He spent twenty years on LOTR; he spent his life on the Silmarillion. It's what he did first and what he was still doing when he died. Here's the next installment of SIlmarillion: Quote On a time of autumn he came in the dusk of evening, and drawing near he saw as he thought a light at the window; and coming warily he looked within. There he saw Eilinel, and her face was worn with grief and hunger, and it seemed to him that he heard her voice lamenting that he had forsaken her. But even as he cried aloud the light was blown out in the wind; wolves howled, and on his shoulders he felt suddenly the heavy hands of Sauron's hunters. Thus Gorlim was ensnared; and taking him to their camp they tormented, seeking to learn the hidings of Barahir and all his ways. But nothing would Gorlim tell. Then they promised him that he should be released and restored to Eilinel, if he would yield; and being at last worn with pain, and yearning for his wife, he faltered. Then straightaway they brought him into the dreadful presence of Sauron; and Sauron said: 'I hear now that thou wouldst barter with me. What is thy price?' LadyofLight P.S. Please don't delete the link to this thread! :( Title: Tolkien Post by: Rug on September 14, 2003, 10:12:35 PM I won't dont worry. However, it will slip off the first page of the city pretty fast.
If anyone starts talkin Tolkien in there, Im gonna chuck em a link here though :) Title: Tolkien Post by: LadyofLight on September 14, 2003, 10:20:11 PM Okay, thanks. :P
Quote And Gorlim answered that he should find Eilinel again, and with her be set free; for he thought Eilinel also had been made captive. Than Sauron smiled, saying: 'That is a small price for so great a treachery. So shall it surely be. Say on!' Now Gorlim would have drawn back, but daunted by the eyes of Sauron he told at last all that he would know. Then Sauron laughed; and he mocked Gorlim, and revealed to him that he had only seen a phantom devised by wizardry to entrap him; for Eilinel was dead. 'Nonetheless I will grant thy prayer,' said Sauron; 'and thou shalt go to Eilinel, and be set free of my service.' Then he put him cruelly to death. LadyofLight Title: Tolkien Post by: Lord Lanair on September 15, 2003, 03:43:34 AM Why should I have bought The Silmarillion if I have all your quotes, lady? LOL Still, keep 'em coming. It's a nice touch.
Oh, want some content for this post? Er... Gorlim should have known better than to trust Sauron! ;) Title: Tolkien Post by: whiteknight on September 15, 2003, 04:08:06 AM i agree.....the silmarillion is incredible.....when i took the time to read it, i was blown away. It fills in so much of what is only hinted at in the more popular books
Title: Tolkien Post by: Lord Lanair on September 16, 2003, 12:26:01 AM I like it much more than LoTR. Except, it's kinda hard to keep track of all those Noldor with the similar names... Feanor, Fingol, Fingolfin, Finarfin... need I say more? LOL
Title: Tolkien Post by: LadyofLight on September 16, 2003, 01:11:43 AM Yeah, it makes it a little more hard to follow, but I like it that way. It keeps it from getting boring so you can get more each time you read it as you become more and more familiar with the characters.
Oh, and you should buy (/have bought) the Silmarillion cuz I'm only going over part of it and it is so much better to read it yourself than to get bits and pieces every day, which makes it harder to get into the story. And for the quote-of-the-post: Quote In this way the hiding of Barahir was revealed, and Morgoth drew his net about it; and the Orcs coming in the still hours before dawn surprised the men of Dorthonion and slew them all, save one. For Beren son of Barahir had been sent by his father on a perilous errand to spy upon the ways of the Enemy, and he was far afield when the lair was taken. But as he slept benighted in the forest he dreamed that carrion-birds sat thick as leaves upon bare trees beside a mere, and blood dripped from their beaks. Then Beren was aware in his dream of a form that came to him across the water, and it was a wraith of Gorlim; and it spoke to him declaring his treachery and death, and bade him make haste to warn his father. Then Beren awoke, and sped through the night, and came back to the lair of the outlaws on the second morning. But as he drew near the carrion-birds rose from the ground and sat in the alder-trees beside Tarn Aeluin, and croaked in mockery. LadyofLight Title: Tolkien Post by: Lord Lanair on September 16, 2003, 01:29:49 AM How could I have not already bought one of Tolkein's greatest works? LOL
And why did you start your quotes in the middle of the book? :hehe: Title: Tolkien Post by: LadyofLight on September 16, 2003, 02:23:17 AM Of Beren and Luthien is my favorite substory, though running close with The Tale of Turin.
And anothe quote: Quote There Beren buried his fathers bones, and raised a cairn of boulders above him, and swore upon it an oath of vengeance. First there for he pursued the Orcs that had slain his father and his kinsmen, and he found their camp by night at Rivil's Well above the Fen of Serech, and because of his wood craft he came near to their fire unseen. There their captain made boast of his deeds, and he held up the hand of Barahir that he had cut off as a token for Sauron that their mission was fulfilled; and the ring of Felagund was on that hand. Then Beren sprang from behind rock, and slew captain, and taking the hand and the ring he escaped, being defended by fate for the Orcs were dismayed, and their arrows wild. Silly orcs. LadyofLight Title: Tolkien Post by: Lord Lanair on September 16, 2003, 04:07:02 AM I say the earlier part of the book is better, when Morgoth and Sauron have less of a control over the land (basically before the secondborn arrive). ;)
And... stupid orcs! LOL Title: Tolkien Post by: Filran on September 16, 2003, 01:44:16 PM My dad has a copy of the Silmarillion. Its about 30+ years old. He's been trying to find it for years now...
Title: Tolkien Post by: LadyofLight on September 17, 2003, 02:47:16 AM The earlier parts are great to but I just find I can place myself in Beren/Luthien/Turin's place better and can feel more emotionally attatched to the characters, though this could simply be because Tolkien developed these stories more. I mean, proportionately to the amount of time that passes look how long the story of Beren and Luthien alone is. Many many pages.
Oh, and I first discovered the Silmarillion from my dad's really old copy. That's the one I sort of wore out so I had to buy another. :D Quote: Quote Thereafter for four years more Beren wandered still upon Dorthonion, a solitary outlaw; but he became the friend of birds and beasts, and they aided him, and did not betray him, and from that time forth he ate no flesh nor slew any living thing that was not in the service of Morgoth. He did not fear death, but only captivity, and being bold and desperate he escaped both death and bonds; and the deeds of lonely daring that he achieved were noised abroad throughout Beleriand, and the tail of them came even into Doriath. At length Morgoth set a price upon his head no less than the price upon the head of Fingon, High King of the Noldor; but the Orcs fled rather at the rumour of his approach than sought him out. Therefore and army was sent against him under the command of Sauron; and Sauron brought werewolves, fell beasts inhabited by dreadful spirits that he had imprisoned in their bodies. LadyofLight Title: Tolkien Post by: Lord Lanair on September 17, 2003, 04:06:05 AM Ok, now we have some action. You're gonna have to post again soon to continue the story. LOL
By the way, why didn't Morgoth just leave Beren to live out his short (human) life in Dorthonion, rather than go through all the trouble of trying to catch him? <_< Title: Tolkien Post by: whiteknight on September 17, 2003, 06:06:21 AM i recently aquired a first American edition of the Silmarillion that i'm extremely proud of
Title: Tolkien Post by: matt_the_shark on September 17, 2003, 08:22:24 PM Quote By the way, why didn't Morgoth just leave Beren to live out his short (human) life in Dorthonion, rather than go through all the trouble of trying to catch him? <_< by the way, I like the story of turin and.........I forget the name, but I know that he is turin's cousin. but of the two, I like Turin's best. He's cool, and he kills alot of people and stuff. and also, that story has alot of detail, and I like that. :) Title: Tolkien Post by: Lord Lanair on September 17, 2003, 08:35:09 PM Quote ummmm, have you read the silmarillion? if so, remember what he does at to morgoth in angband(hope that's spelled right).and he's killing all these orcs and everything and stuff. of course morgoth's gonna go after him! He only goes to Angband later, after Sauron and his army come to get him. ;) Title: Tolkien Post by: LadyofLight on September 19, 2003, 02:47:49 AM He goies after Beren because he dare attack the "great" Morgoth. Beren fights well and has become well known, which makes Morgoth look bad and people fear him less. Basically, Morgoth is trying to save face. Plus, he is inherently evil, so will always do the evil thing, not something kind like let him live.
How did you find a first edition? Quote: Quote All that land was now become filled with evil, and all clean things were departing from it; and Beren was pressed so hard that at last he was forced to flee from Dorthonion. In time of winter and snow he forsook the land and grave of his father, and climbing into the high land of Doriath. There it was put into his heart that he would go down into the Hidden Kingdom, where no mortal foot had trodden. Terrible was his southward journey. Sheer were the precipices of Ered Gorgoroth, and beneath their feet were shadows that were laid before the rising of the Moon. Beyond lay the wilderness of Dungortheb, where the sorcery of Sauron and the power of Melian came together, and horror and madness walked. There spiders of the fell race of Ungoliant abode, spinning their unseen webs in which all living things were snared; and monsters wandered there that were born in the long dark before the Sun, hunting silently with many eyes. No food for Elves or Men was there in that haunted land, but death only. That journey is not accounted least among the great deeds of Beren, but he spoke of it to no one after, lest the horror return into his mind; and none know how he found a way, and so came by paths that no Man nor Elf else ever dared to tread to the borders of Doriath. And he passed through the mazes that Melian wove about the kingdom of Thingol, even as she had foretold; for a great doom lay upon him. LadyofLight Title: Tolkien Post by: Lord Lanair on September 19, 2003, 02:54:49 AM Just a question- why does Tolkein always use the word "doom" when describing a person's fate? :miffed:
And if Morgoth was half as intelligent than he was evil, he would have realized the power of Beren before the situation got out of control. LOL Title: Tolkien Post by: LadyofLight on September 19, 2003, 05:18:14 AM Tolkien likely uses doom instead of fate because it has a darker connotation, and in the end fate really is dark. If you are human, you die. If you are elf your soul is bound to earth for all time, going through all the pain, grief, and loss of this world. So using a word with a darker connotation seems more appropriate.
Also, Morgoth didn't back off Beren because he was proud. Beside Eru himself he was the most powerful being in existence, and he didn't think anyone could touch him. The likelihood of Beren's success was so low it really didn't even seem a possibility. The other possibilty is that Beren's potential for power is why he wanted to kill him before he could get any stronger. Also, evil is proud, and it is one of their greatest weaknesses. Morgoth felt impenetrable, and maybe therefore wasn't careful enough as he let Luthien sing instead of killing them both instantly. His pride caused him to let his guard down so to speak. Quote(Yay! My favorite part): Quote It is told in the Lay of Leithian that Beren came stumbling into Doriath grey and bowed as with many years of woe, so great had been the torment of the road. But wandering in the summer in the woods of Neldoreth he came upon Lúthien, daughter of Thingol and Melian, at a time of evening under moonrise, as she danced upon the unfading grass in the glades beside Esgalduin. Then all memory of his pain departed from him, and he fell into an enchantment; for Lúthien was the most beautiful of all the Children of Ilúvatar. Blue was her raiment as the unclouded heaven, but her eyes were grey as the starlit evening; her mantle was sewn with golden flowers, but her hair was dark as the shadows of twilight. As the light upon the leaves of trees, as the voice of clear waters, as the stars above the mists of the world, such was her glory and her loveliness; and in her face was a shining light. LadyofLight Title: Tolkien Post by: Drauka on September 19, 2003, 05:18:36 AM I disagree. The sim is overfilled with masses of information. But it is a difficult read because of the complete lack of fluff. And I strongly feel the trilogy is the best. (Plus his son had a hand in everything except the trilogy)
Title: Tolkien Post by: LadyofLight on September 19, 2003, 05:29:04 AM It is difficult to read and takes a long time because it takes concentration as every sentence counts. But that's what it is, a condensation of Tolkien's life works: everything he devoted his time and energy to involving middle-earth in one book. If you want more filler, read the History of Middle Earth series, which fills out more. It fills twelve volumes to be exact.
But I think only including the sentence that need to be in the story can make it more impactful. All the weaker points have been cut out. It leaves only the more powerful and intense pieces, as well as necessary plot. Plus, in the case of Beren and Luthien and in the Tale of Turin these areas were developed more thoroughly than the rest and have that beautiful detail that made LOTR so wonderful and captivating. I'm not saying it's necessarily better, but perhaps equal, and it's refreshing to read something new when you can't even get a hamburger without hearing about LOTR. I can imagine it for myself, picture in my own mind the moment Beren sees Luthien in the woods and falls in love, I have my own picture of his face, his composure, without it beeing shaped by an existing film. I love LOTR, by I love the Silmarillion perhaps in a more deep manner as it is largely unaffected by all this fluff society has attatched too it. Another Quote: Quote But she vanished from his sight; and he became dumb, as one that is bound under a spell, and he strayed long in the woods, wild and wary as a beast, seeking for her. In his heart he called her Tinúviel, that signifies Nightingale, daughter of twilight, in the Grey-elven tongue, for he knew no other name for her. And he saw her afar as leaves in the winds of autumn, and in winter as a star upon a hill, but a chain was upon his limbs. LadyofLight Title: Tolkien Post by: Lord Lanair on September 19, 2003, 08:34:59 PM I prefer battle scenes, or action ones, in Tolkein's books. My eyes sorta glaze over if I have to read too many pages describing someone's appearance. :)
And the History of Middle Earth series; is it written by Tolkein? Because I've never heard of it. :miffed: Title: Tolkien Post by: LadyofLight on September 20, 2003, 12:43:35 AM Well, I think I might glaze over too if it were pages and pages, but the description of luthien is only a paragraph...
The History of middle Earth series is basically the SIlmarillion with less editing by Christopher Tolkien. It's all the info that went into the Silmarillion (plus more that his son cut), but in twelve volumes. You can find them a lot of places, even in safeway, just not usually all at one time. Have you ever heard of The Lost Tales or Lays of Beleriand? Those are part of the series. Quote There came a time near dawn on the eve of spring, and Lúthien danced upon a green hill; and suddenly she began to sing. Keen, heart-piercing was her song as the song of the lark that rises from the gates of night and pours its voice among the dying stars, seeing the sun behind the walls of the world; and the song of Lúthien released the behind the walls of the world; and the song of Lúthien released the bonds of winter, and the frozen waters spoke, and flowers sprang from the cold earth where her feet had passed. LadyofLight Title: Tolkien Post by: Arkanor on September 20, 2003, 04:05:01 AM It is impossible to read through HoME linearly. The stories, while containing much more detail and information than the Sil does (i.e. The Fall of Gondolin has heraldic devices, descriptions of the Plain of Tum..., descriptions of the Gates of Gondolin, etc), are not actually a complete book. They are really the unfinished notes of J.R.R. TOlkien, edited for (some) coherency by Christopher TOlkien. Still, though not canon, HoME is EXCELLENT for referencing obscure moments in Middle-Earth.
BTW, go HERE! (http://www.tolkien.cro.net) and to the Forum. We can always use new members there, especially those who know quite a lot about LoTR, the Sil, and the HoME. Title: Tolkien Post by: LadyofLight on September 20, 2003, 04:55:42 PM Well, the ability to read them linearly does depend on one's love of Tolkien. I am frankly obsessed, and I have read Lost Tales Volume 1 and 2 and am working on the Lay's of Beleriand.
Arkanor is right though, it is difficult and many parts are incomplete, that's whay his son made the Silmarillion, a sort of coherent anthology of his father's works. But if you're one of those people who want to know every little detail about Tolkien's Middle Earth, they're awesome, but if you just want to be purely entertained I suggest you pick up LOTR or Silmarillion again. Quote Then the spell of silence fell from Beren, and he called to her, crying Tinúviel; and the woods echoed the name. Then she halted in wonder, and fled no more, and Beren came to her. But as she looked on him, doom fell upon her, and she loved him; yet she slipped from his arms and vanished from his sight even as the day was breaking. Then Beren lay upon the ground in a swoon, as one slain at once by bliss and grief; and he fell into a sleep as it were into an abyss of shadow, and waking he was cold as stone, and his heart barren and forsaken. And wandering in mind he groped as one that is stricken with sudden blindness, and seeks with hands to grasp the vanished light. Thus he began the payment of anguish for the fate that was laid on him; and in his fate Lúthien was caught, and being immortal she shared in his mortality, and being free received his chain; and her anguish was greater than any other of the Eldalië has known. LadyofLight Title: Tolkien Post by: LadyofLight on September 23, 2003, 02:36:08 AM Is this thread dying? How sad...
Title: Tolkien Post by: Lord Lanair on September 23, 2003, 04:02:13 AM Hmmm... we need more (relevent) topics! C'mon, it can't be that hard!
Er... how 'bout the stupidity of the Noldor in refusing to abandon Gondolin? <_< Title: Tolkien Post by: LadyofLight on September 23, 2003, 05:03:29 AM Or we could talk about any of Tolkien's works. This isn't just a Silmarillion thread. We could talk about LOTR or whatever. Or how about the Tale of Turin and how tragic it is that elves can't escape their own fate?
LadyofLight P.S. Sorry no quotes, but on different computer. Title: Tolkien Post by: Filran on September 23, 2003, 11:23:30 AM I can't talk LoTR anymore really. I haven't read anything else, so those fly over my head.
LoTR gets a bit boring, tedious, and when you read the ending 19 times you kinda feel he crapped out, and saved his characters, when you feel they were going to die. 19 times was enough for me. LOL Title: Tolkien Post by: Lord Lanair on September 23, 2003, 09:05:02 PM 19 times would be enough for me too! LOL
But I like it when the characters survive. Would you rather have all the characters you got to know exterminated? :( Title: Tolkien Post by: Filran on September 23, 2003, 09:39:38 PM Yes, because it would have felt more real, and I didn't like them anyway. They were all too... ideal.
I liked Boromir better than all of them. He had flaws, and you could see those flaws. He was a normal human being, and I love that in characters. The regular person thing. No extra resistance, no resistance to temptation, no magic... Thats the main reason most fantasy books disgust me now. Its always pointing toward the ideal. I hate ideal. Thats why I love TCTC. Covenant is human, down to everything. Yes, he had a power, but did he want to use it? No. Did he use it? No. Did he know how to use it? No. Did he even want to save the world he was flung into? No. But, he had to anyway. I think that LoTR could've held a bit more for me if some of the characters were to die. From what I remeber, Pippin was crushed under a troll/Olog-hai. How did he survive being CRUSHED under one of them?! He should have been hobbit JELLY! And Frodo and Sam would have died to, if not for the Bird-lord. Now, that was extreme cooincidence, because I cannot remeber if there was a reason of why they were flying over Mordor. Usually its a rule in writing, an unwriten rule mind you, for characters and situations. Early on, while they are still 'weak' cooincidenses should happen every so often, but to end? It should be on the characters own inner strength. Frodo didn't have it. I would really only believe Sam getting out of there alive, because I like Sam, and I believe he, not Frodo, is the hero of LoTR. Just think, where would Frodo be without Sam? Title: Tolkien Post by: LadyofLight on September 24, 2003, 01:41:58 AM By the ending being some sad and some happy that does make it more real. I real life, not everyone usually ends up all happy and live happily ever after, but it doesn't usually result in everybody dead either. There's a balance. Also, Frodo falling apart and eventually having to rely on Sam is another example of it being more real. If that were to happen, no one, not even the most innocent little hobbit, could withstand wearing the ring that long. I have other stuff to say, but frankly I'm in the middle of a family crisis and can't think that much.
LadyofLight Quote Beyond his hope she returned to him where he sat in darkness, and long ago in the Hidden Kingdom she laid her hand in his. Thereafter often she came to him, and they went in secret through the woods together from spring to summer; and no others of the Children of Ilúvatar have had joy so great, though the time was brief. But Daeron the minstrel also loved Lúthien, and he espied her meetings with Beren, and betrayed them to Thingol. Then the King was filled with anger, for Lúthien he loved above all things, setting her above all the princes of the Elves; whereas mortal Men he did not even take into his service. Therefore he spoke in grief and amazement to Lúthien; but she would reveal nothing, until he swore an oath to her that he would neither slay Beren nor imprison him. But he sent his servants to lay hands on him and lead him to Menegroth as a malefactor; and Lúthien forestalling them led Beren herself before the throne of Thingol, as if he were an honoured guest. Title: Tolkien Post by: Lord Lanair on September 24, 2003, 02:22:33 AM I say that Boromir was one of the worst characters, because he was so flawed. I like a character that usually (if not mostly) does the right things, and whom I can idolize? No... more like side with or respect. Someone like Gandalf would be an example. ;)
And if you want characters to die, read Dragon Weather, and the sequal, by Lawrence Scott-Evans. Surprisingly, it is a fantasy series with character deaths! LOL Title: Tolkien Post by: Filran on September 24, 2003, 03:25:13 AM No, I don't like character deaths, just where it feels there should be a death, there should be one. Preferably, very, very moving ones.
Now, I myself, got very, very attached to Boromir because he felt the pull of the ring. Because he just so depretly wanted to protect his home no matter what. I saw him as very honorable. And how he managed to help them go through Charadras, or however you spell it, by blazing the path! If he wasn't there, I think we'd have Fellowship popsicles! Yummy. I tend to get attached to characters, and I am an emotional dude. I get depressed, and cried for Boromir, cause he rocked. Everything just sorta lacked after he was gone. I had to go over to Sam to just barely fill the slot of well-liked character in there. ALL THE CHARACTERS I LIKE DIE! WHY?! WHYYYY?! Sturm, Boromir, Tom... How many countless others?! Title: Tolkien Post by: Arkanor on September 24, 2003, 03:34:40 AM LOL... a lot.
A lot of the movie characters sucked, unfortunately. Frodo fell too easily to the Ring, the other hobbits were a little too immature, Faramir was... gah! But Aragorn and Gandalf were ok. Theoden was acceptable, but Eowyn was too aggressive. And what was up with the Elves in TTT? Title: Tolkien Post by: Filran on September 24, 2003, 01:02:15 PM The Elves were NEVER at Helm's Deep! I feel insulted! THAT WAS A HUMAN VICTORY! All the elves ran off.
And where were those rabid murderous trees whos names I forgot?! They came to Helm's deep to EAT teh Uruk-hai and orcs that ran away. But no evil murdering trees that eat flesh. And Faramir! They butchered poor, poor Faramir! And Frodo never made comments about how he was old, which, he was! An old hobbit was Frodo baggins! Theoden, I liked how they portrayed him. I found him good, and with a voice that I could assosiate with the character. Viggo was a very good Aragorn, though, in some aspects could be better. I have one gripe with Gandalf in the movie though. They had HIM lead the way over Charadras, when it was Boromir! And they gave Gandalf some of Boromir's lines! A curse! A curse upon them! And Glorfindel was replaced with Arwen! Horrid! I liked Glorfindel! And I noticed an error at the black gates of Mordor in TTT. They had trolls. In SUNLIGHT. Trolls turn to stone in sunlight! There was no way those were Olog-hai! The BASTARDS. Title: Tolkien Post by: matt_the_shark on September 24, 2003, 09:25:00 PM okay, just a few things:
the elf at helms deep thing was horrible. it sucked. end of story. the "rabid murderous trees"were ents. and they didn't eat the orcs, they more crushed them and stuff because they hated the orcs for senselessly chopping the trees down. the movie farimir-GAH! HE'S HORRIBLE! WTF DID THEY DO TO HIM??? Frodo Baggins was not old. he was only in his fifties when he goes off on the quest. Bilbo was an old hobbit indeed. he was 131 at the end of the trilogy. but Frodo was not old. :hmmm: I think they did a good job with theoden, but not the best job, and they could have been better. Viggo was a VERY good Aragorn. My only complaint was that he could have been a little more dark sounding in the first movie. I guess Borimir did lead them in a way over caradhras(I think that's how you spell it), but Aragorn and Gandalf also did a bit of the leading there. also, in Moria, Gandalf and Gimli led them. btw, what lines did Gandalf steal? I'm too lazy to look. What the hell happened to Glorfindel! The person did a decent job playing Awen, but they should have had Glorfindel in it. :hmmm: stupid directors, they let the stupid trolls live. they should have made it more dark and deadly looking in Mordor. Title: Tolkien Post by: Filran on September 24, 2003, 09:33:19 PM Quote the "rabid murderous trees"were ents. and they didn't eat the orcs, they more crushed them and stuff because they hated the orcs for senselessly chopping the trees down. Actually, I was refering to the trees that went fom Fangor to Helm's Deep, not the Ents to Isengard. They were Th- something. Lemme get my book! Well, they also forgot Hama at Helm's Deep, who I thought kicked ass, even thought he was minor. He died in the battle, and was buried at the gates, so that he could protect them for all time. And they replaced Erkenbrand with Eomer. Well, anyway, I can't find them now. But they were FORMER Ents. They ate/made the orcs never appear ever again. Title: Tolkien Post by: LadyofLight on September 25, 2003, 03:10:45 AM They were Huorns.
Here is my view I posted in another board once: Quote Hello, with all of the talk about whether ROTK will be accurate to Tolkein, etc. I fear I must make a comment of which many diehard LOTR book lovers will hate me for. But first let me say I LOVE Tolkein's books. He was a literary genius. Maybe that will help you understand I do love the book and mean nothing ill by what I'm about to say. You see, many people believe PJ should have kept the movies strictly to the book, play by play. Well, first I must point out that if he did so, because there is so much that happens, there would be no depth. One of the reasons it probably hasn't won an oscar (though I daresay it deserves it!) is because the in film, deep character depth and psychological understanding of a character is very important. Now, drama is basically a showcase for acting. Movies like A Beautiful Mind are excellent acting. People come away going "Wow, that man is so talented, he completely disappeared into the character." Unfortunately, while this same skill may be applied to fantasy, it is less noticed because a lot of the film is telling just what happened, not what it meant . Now, ELijah is one of those actors who can invoke the ""Wow", but just the events actually take away from getting to really see Frodo as well as in say, a Drama (interesting side thought, what sort of drama would Frodo be in?) Basicallly, what I am trying to say is that if PJ had done TOlkein event for event, we would not have time to know the characters at all and would feel disconnected and would frankly not care what was happenning. It would fail to capture our interest. We NEED to know Frodo in an intimate way that that would not provide. A movie is different than a book, it is not something that can be read over the course of a month when a viewer has time. It has to fit into certain time restrictions, or no one will watch it (perhaps with the exception of people like us ) People expect a book to be more in depth. But that kind of depth just isn't practical in a movie. Does anyone get what I'm trying to say? So, movies and books are different, what does that mean to diehards like us? What it comes down to is just seperating the movie and film in your mind as entirely seperate entities. Seems difficult? of course, as they both follow roughly the same story. But do you have trouble watching, say, All I Want because it is not like the classic Romeo and Juliet? Of course not. They're entirely different. Well, try and apply the same thing. The movie is so different, just forget it's based on a book while we watch it. Just experience the movie, get lost in it, and don't think about alternate plots, or what they've changed, but what they've created within itself. I don't know if anyone understands a thing I've saide, but I shall refrain from going on incase I'm boring everyone. If you want me to explain it more I'll try. I just know I've pretty much managed to accomplish this, and I have a passion for both the movie and the book, and neither one upsets me. I left the theater from Two Towers with the same thrill Tolkein's work gives me. There just different, perhaps better suited to their own genres. Kelsey LadyofLight Title: Tolkien Post by: matt_the_shark on September 25, 2003, 04:02:04 AM yeah, their huorns, they were once trees that sort of evolved into a simmilar form of the ents but they are not actually ents. as for what the Lady of light said up there, I agree partially, the movie is meant to be a different view of the book and should not be entirely like to the book. by this I mean that minor changes should be made simply because a movie and a book are two entirely different forms of getting a story across. however, there are some changes in the book that I was quite qutraged to see. one of these changes was the absense of Tom Bombadil. now we all know that Tom is not overall an important charracter, but he is an essential to find the bature of the ring itself. it also refers in a way back to ancient times seeing as how tom is an ancient person that "came before the world" suggesting that he is a maiar or a lesser spirit. but sometimes backround information is needed to explain the main storyline if you understand my meaning.)or maybe you don't and take this as senseless rambling :P ) But the worst book to movie change that PJ (kind of reminds me of PB and J :P ) made is the altering of frodo's course. how the hell is he gonna make frodo go to gondor??? that completely changes the storyline because the ring was never supposed to go near Gondor. Also it completly alters the personality of Faramir and makes him look way too much like to Borimir, his brother. Faramir was supposed to be stronger in mind than his brother and able to resist the evil temptation of the ring, not to be swayed to take it to his father, the steward. it ruins his good position for the third book where he is held in such reverence by his fellow people. and it kind of defeats the argument that is set between him and his father generated by the death of Borimir.
there, that is my point. feel free to argue with it if you want, I am open to your ideas on the subject. Title: Tolkien Post by: Filran on September 25, 2003, 11:47:17 AM Yes, they ruined good Faramir. Now, I didn't like him as much as his brother, and I always imagined that slightly, somewhere in there, he felt the pull of the ring, he was just good at not showing it.
And also, in the movie they made him question Smeagol alone, when in the books he was guestioning with Frodo there to keep Smeagol calm. All they did was make Faramir seem like a giant ass. Title: Tolkien Post by: matt_the_shark on September 25, 2003, 04:41:16 PM yes, on the subject of smeagol, what do you think of the fish song that smeagol does by the pool? sort of disturbing, don't you think?
Title: Tolkien Post by: Lord Lanair on September 25, 2003, 11:08:54 PM It fits his character. And Faramir was Boromir's brother? It's been a while since I read the books, and some of the characters' names excape me (especially the prines of Rohan! Could they have any more names begin with "E"?!?). LOL
Title: Tolkien Post by: Filran on September 25, 2003, 11:54:17 PM Yes. Yes they could. Want a list?
Here ya go. XD Earendil Earnur Ecthelion Edain Elbereth Eldat Elentari Elendil Elessar Elfhelm Elfstone Elladan Elrohir Elrond (Halfelven. :P) Elwing Ents Entwives Eomer Eomung eored Eorl Eorlingas Eothain Eowyn Erestor Erkebrand Evenstar And yes, Boromir, and Faramir were brothers. Boromir the eldest by 5 years, at the age of 40. Faramir the youngest by 5 years at the age of 35. Title: Tolkien Post by: LadyofLight on September 26, 2003, 01:19:58 AM I liked smeagol's song, it was rather amusing. Smeagol was one of the best characters in the movie, most definitely.
Quote Then Thingol looked upon Beren in scorn and anger; but Melian was silent. 'Who are you', said the King, 'that come hither as a thief, and unbidden dare to approach my throne?' But Beren being filled with dread, for the splendour of Menegroth and the majesty of Thingol were very great, answered nothing. Therefore Lúthien spoke, and said: 'He is Beren son of Barahir, lord of Men, mighty foe of Morgoth, the tale of whose deeds is become a song even among the Elves.' 'Let Beren speak!' said Thingol. 'What would you here, unhappy mortal, and for what cause have you left your own land to enter this, which is forbidden to such as you? Can you show reason why my power should not be laid on you in heavy punishment for you insolence and folly?' Title: Tolkien Post by: matt_the_shark on September 26, 2003, 08:18:31 PM yes, smeagol was very well played. the song was quite amusing (accompamied by him smashing the fish to death, it was a great combination LOL ).
filran, some of those aren't names, their words! (ex: eldar(forgot the r on yours, it means the elves who left cuivienen) and edain (men, any specific type?)) oh, and how could you forget elronds brother, elros? you slacker! :P Title: Tolkien Post by: Lord Lanair on September 27, 2003, 01:00:29 AM I'm impressed he knew so many to begin with. And I was thinking of thr Rohirrim when I said there were so many E names. I knew people like Elrond! LOL
Title: Tolkien Post by: LadyofLight on September 28, 2003, 03:13:56 AM Tolkein did the same with others as well. Ex, Aragorn son of Arathorn.
Very similar Quote Then Beren looking up beheld the eyes of Lúthien, and his glance went also to the face of Melian and it seemed to him that words were put into his mouth. Fear left him, and the pride of the eldest house of Men returned to him; and he said: 'My fate, O King, led me hither, through perils such as few even of the Elves would dare. And here I have found what I sought not indeed, but finding I would possess for ever. For it is above all gold and silver, and beyond all jewels. Neither rock, nor steel, nor the fires of Morgoth, nor all the powers of the Elf-kingdoms, shall keep from me the treasure that I desire. For Lúthien your daughter is the fairest of all the Children of the World.' LadyofLight Title: Tolkien Post by: Filran on September 28, 2003, 04:00:23 AM Theres alot more. And, technicly, words are names, are they not? ;)
Title: Tolkien Post by: Lord Lanair on September 28, 2003, 04:54:47 AM Actually, names are words ( :D ), and the best ones Tolkein came up with are probably the Elven ones. :)
|