Title: Which Age owned? Post by: smi256 on March 07, 2004, 07:01:46 AM Nothing lame like 'cuz we smashed such-and-such clan', but ‘good battles’ is still a reason. OH, and when you started might be nice to know also :D
as a reminder. (post is something if something is wrong or needing to be added) Age 0 – death to the soldiers Age 1 – enters the spys with their spying/sabotage, mercenaries, and weapon damage sabotage was age 2, weapon damage wasn't used until age two either Age 2 – change of race bonuses (that happened in Age 1 didn't it?) Age 3 Beta – removal of sabotage, (calculation changes) [disclaimer] I will delete/edit rant/rave posts or other bothersome comments and such (I’m so covering my rear due to some people just being to damn nit-picky. and if you still BS your way through it, I'll do it anyways just cuz I'm mean :D and I'll say "talk to the sheep, cuz the he doesn't bleating care :sheep: " .get it? LOL bleating, sheep bleat ;) and umm..it's funny :( ok fine :hmmm: I'll be quite now <_< ) Title: Which Age owned? Post by: SS on March 07, 2004, 07:05:08 AM I think Age0 was best, simply because it was the first one, and people actually played the game and weren't so bothered about stats and crap. Age1 wasn't bad either. Age2 was when it started going downhill.
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Perdition on March 07, 2004, 07:12:55 AM I'd say age 1. i wasnt around for age 0 and age one is the best out of what I've expeirienced
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Filran on March 07, 2004, 07:14:03 AM Age 0 hands down.
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: smi256 on March 07, 2004, 07:47:33 AM Even though it’s neat to have new and different options, the whole system has been bogged down I think. The simple way was fun, though I can see that it would get boring if nothing changed. I just think it’s bloody tedious for having to logon so much for maintenance of the account (time I don’t have) or even monotonous with respect that you could very easily set up some ‘simple’ program that just does one thing over and over, and thus removing the human aspect of the game.
[/rant] :sheep: Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Perdition on March 07, 2004, 07:50:09 AM well everything gets boring after a while. cept this place. and we tend to repeat ourselves too. hmm weird.
i need to learn how to drink water. it got everywhere but my mouth. LOL Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Biteme360 on March 07, 2004, 08:18:36 AM i started prity early in age 1
age 1 didn't have sabotage that was age 2 that started that age 1 had the weapon damage thing, but i think it was disabled or something you forgot about the 5X rule, durning most of age 1 there was a rule that you could only attack some 5X your own size or half of your own size, i think that should be brought back, to help stop the fake , it would mean LS would prity much be unstopable cause no more massing him, but i think the game was funner with it, and you didn't have baby accounts checking your str before the real account came in and kicked the crud out of your def. Title: Which Age owned? Post by: underruler on March 07, 2004, 08:24:15 AM I voted Age 2 b/c I wasn't here for the other ages and Age 3 Beta stinks like poo.
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Drifter1 on March 07, 2004, 08:26:16 AM not much difference between age 2 and age 3 beta...i vote age1
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: underruler on March 07, 2004, 08:45:48 AM Well at least sabotage was there.
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: matt_the_shark on March 07, 2004, 03:35:06 PM sabotage sucks. it's the only thing the elves had and it was only an early game thing :hmmm:
I started playing in late march last year.(yes, so i am almost a year old! :D) and i say age one was ownage. Other than the occasional down time (but that's every age, isn't it?) it was how the game was meant to be. :) Title: Which Age owned? Post by: G1lbert on March 07, 2004, 03:53:23 PM Age 0, I started playing it when it started (or one week after that, can't pinpoint it anymore). I just loved the 'x (number of) pitifully soldiers eaten'-messages that came when you attacked someone as an Orc. Also the starting of alliances, everything so new and fresh and juicy and fruity and..
When it ended I was happy to have reached around 100 men.. Age 1 was also nice, Orcs lost their eating of opponents-capacities, but that got 'rewarded' by giving them a 25% more casualties-bonus, which was kinda funny, also because it was a knife which cut at both sides (would you encounter 25% more casualties, or would the opponent encounter 25% more casualties?). Age 1 saw the real start of alliances and -in my opinion- the time of glory for N.O.O.. It was funny to have your troops carry 5 or more weapons each.. at the end, age 1 itself became boring, it lasted way too long. The war with TGA made it a bit funny again, but even that died out. Since, the game in itself died out more and more. The 25% casualties got changed in age2, which saw sabotage and Orcs with attack-bonus.. (the latter I found quite good, but the sabotage sucked big time). Beta... boring.. :P Title: Which Age owned? Post by: matt_the_shark on March 07, 2004, 03:59:47 PM ah, the war with NOO, that was good. i remember it well. I had a good time on your forums back then :)
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: ns33 on March 07, 2004, 05:50:58 PM I remember my 300-soldier army flinging some 100 thousand knives at the enemy. It was fun! :rolleyes:
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: underruler on March 07, 2004, 08:54:06 PM Quote sabotage sucks. it's the only thing the elves had and it was only an early game thing :hmmm: Well I'm just basing this on what I have seen, but now there isn't even sabotage to make elves good. Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Hyvry1 on March 08, 2004, 12:01:06 AM Age0 was the best. No-one had played it before and so did not know loads of tricks to help them get ahead.
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Lord Lanair on March 08, 2004, 05:17:06 AM Age 1 was the best- only because I wasn't around for Age 0. LOL
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: matt_the_shark on March 08, 2004, 05:48:59 AM indeed. age one was ownage. back then i was proud of my 750k attack. i was also proud of my 14k defense! LOL
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Saladin on March 09, 2004, 02:45:46 AM Age 1 definetly. I really played KoC back then and at my zenith i had 5k elves. Age 2 i played halfheartedly and i don't play anymore
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Lord Lanair on March 09, 2004, 03:33:38 AM Ditto.
They need to make TBG much higher again. :( Title: Which Age owned? Post by: matt_the_shark on March 09, 2004, 03:35:22 AM what they need to do is get age one back and maybe add more weapons. oh, and it would be nice if they upped TBG again too :).
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Lord Lanair on March 09, 2004, 03:46:45 AM We need to be able to trade, or change commanders/officers in the game, too. :(
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: SS on March 09, 2004, 03:49:05 AM You're starting to describe Fate of Nations here. :P
*will get his arse in gear regarding that at some stage soon* Title: Which Age owned? Post by: matt_the_shark on March 09, 2004, 03:49:06 AM you're getting into the slave labor thing again :P
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: underruler on March 09, 2004, 03:50:30 AM They should make it more realistic where the bigger armies get more gold...b/c of the extra people that can pillage instead of having like 500 soldiers be occupied by 50 or something.
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: matt_the_shark on March 09, 2004, 03:51:50 AM eh? you lost me on that last part...:(
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Lord Lanair on March 09, 2004, 04:03:58 AM I think I understand. It should be more of an exponential growth... soldiers vs. TBG, instead of a linear "each soldier generates 26 gold" type of thingy. I think? :paranoid:
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: matt_the_shark on March 09, 2004, 04:06:06 AM but one more person will make alot more profound effect on a small army rather than a large army.
they should base recruits to you army on how good you do in battle or something...that would be interesting... Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Lord Lanair on March 09, 2004, 04:08:46 AM Quote they should base recruits to you army on how good you do in battle or something...that would be interesting... Too hard for the idiot programmers to do, but a cool idea. ;) Title: Which Age owned? Post by: matt_the_shark on March 09, 2004, 04:10:47 AM no, like if you win a battle you would gain pupularity points. it would also go for defending attacks. the more popularity points you get, the more people you get.
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: LadyofLight on March 09, 2004, 05:28:06 AM Like an automated unit production based on success rate of attacks. Nifty idea. But our admins out stupid. (No offense)
Maybe SS should make a promise on FoN date or he'll have to suck his foot? That's some motivation. Or if that's not enough maybe he'll have to lick rug's foot or something... Or his mum's. :blink: Title: Which Age owned? Post by: SS on March 09, 2004, 04:53:07 PM :blink:
Um. I'm not sucking anything. :P Title: Which Age owned? Post by: matt_the_shark on March 09, 2004, 09:23:45 PM LIAR! YOU SUCKED YOUR TOES! I KNOW IT! :P
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: LadyofLight on March 10, 2004, 03:13:34 AM Sorry, I was in a random mood when I posted that...
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Filran on March 10, 2004, 03:45:19 AM Make him lick MY feet. My feet are dirty. :)
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Lord Lanair on March 10, 2004, 05:17:30 AM Imagine what they'll be like when SS finally finishes the project. LOL
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: FragMaster1972 on March 10, 2004, 08:31:46 AM by the time ss finishes the project, all thats left of any of us will be bones. <_<
oh yeah. wasn't here for age 0. age 1 kicked. age 2 started to suck. age 3 is less entertaining than watching the Congress channel. Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Filran on March 10, 2004, 09:16:03 PM I agree!
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: matt_the_shark on March 10, 2004, 09:20:22 PM i agree too! :D
/me waits for SS to start doing something :P Title: Which Age owned? Post by: evilknight on March 10, 2004, 10:22:34 PM things are sorta....stalling for the fon project. just give us a minute.
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: SS on March 10, 2004, 10:26:18 PM Stalling? Pffft. We're not moving at all, we're hovering in mid air with me having half a website done, but I've had to leave the plane to go get other stupid stuff done for a while. Hopefully I can hop back into the plane and get us going forward again at the weekend. Assuming nothing crap goes wrong, which it far too often does. :mellow:
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: evilknight on March 10, 2004, 10:29:00 PM ......yeah, we know you're lazy ss. :P
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: LadyofLight on March 11, 2004, 03:31:50 AM Speaking of this weekend, my B-Day's Saturday. 18! Yay! :P
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Perdition on March 11, 2004, 03:58:00 AM ah thats fun you can legally buy pron. if you so desired. oo better yet buy some for me :P.
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Lord Lanair on March 11, 2004, 04:18:40 AM :rolleyes: Sigh
Wasn't FoN supposed to be done a month ago? LOL Title: Which Age owned? Post by: SS on March 11, 2004, 04:20:17 AM We've never given a fixed date for exactly the reason that my stuff never manages to stay on target. :(
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Lord Lanair on March 11, 2004, 04:33:46 AM coughmindteamcough LOL
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Perdition on March 11, 2004, 04:36:47 AM hahah I forgot all about mindteam.
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: EvilTracy on March 11, 2004, 07:50:13 AM Age two was good... but, they should have stopped it in early December.... 3 months would have been plenty.
Age 0 - I didn't play Age 1 - No sabotage, Rank based on army size, no in game messages, 1 attack to take all money.... just very new stage of developement Age 2 - Introduced sab... YEAH!, Rank not based on army size anymore, in game messaging, it rocked... but, once just about everyone was sab immune, in game messages began to talk about peoples moms, mass attacks from accounts that do 20 damage... yet take 2-3 points off your skins.... then it was time to stop Age 2 and move on... Age 2.5 (beta) - i'm sure it's all been said already <_< beta what? The new non sab, less money, more clicking age? Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Filran on March 11, 2004, 12:58:23 PM This may seem off topic, but, EvilTracy, why is there a frog with you?
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: matt_the_shark on March 11, 2004, 02:29:21 PM i think that he had a "biggest frog" contest with one of us or something...i forget who won...
is it really gonna be your birthday this weekend, ladyoflight? HAPPY BIRTHDAY! :) :D Title: Which Age owned? Post by: LadyofLight on March 11, 2004, 02:37:06 PM Yep, 18 the day after tomorrow. :D
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Hyvry1 on March 11, 2004, 04:02:56 PM cool we are a similar age! i am 18 next month.
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: matt_the_shark on March 11, 2004, 04:07:23 PM happy birthday to you too then! :P
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Perdition on March 11, 2004, 04:10:05 PM hold that thought for a month sharky
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: matt_the_shark on March 11, 2004, 04:10:47 PM aww, do i have to? :P
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: SS on March 11, 2004, 10:35:49 PM Not only do you have to, but if you don't then I'll slap a couple of spam warnings on you. :P
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Lord Lanair on March 12, 2004, 04:37:11 AM Ok, at least I get 1 chance first to say "Happy Birthday, Lady." :D
Tracy- sabbing was awful, pathetic, and became useless 1 month into the game. ;) Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Kidirk on March 14, 2004, 11:38:02 PM The problem with age 1 was inactivity, there should've been a thing cutting you off if you didn't go on a vacation mode. The whole game got bottom heavy, I remember my old name being deleted somehow and starting a new one. I found at least a thousand accounts with the first letters legol(legolas spawns) inactive with over 2 million. (before I applied for TGA mind you) some reached into the tens of millions.... Age 2, the sabatoge.... that was just nuts...... age 3 seems to have found the right mix but I'm wondering if the Elves are getting jipped.
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: underruler on March 14, 2004, 11:43:09 PM yea b/c nobody really likes spying...it's not very helpful unless you really want to raise in rank. I think that's the only thing that's keeping me afloat in rank. I just don't like Age 3 cuz I haven't found any good farms and there seems to be so little money around.
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: LadyofLight on March 15, 2004, 03:26:44 AM Exactly, I can't find any farms either. :hmmm:
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Drifter1 on March 15, 2004, 06:04:25 AM i had some, but i outgrew those so i don't get much gold from them if i attack and most armies with more soldiers than mine have a really high defense <_<
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: underruler on March 15, 2004, 06:38:43 AM I can find people but it's a really bad turn out b/c I have a much larger army then people w/ crappy DA.
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Kidirk on March 16, 2004, 06:46:20 PM It may be just that I'm size 6, but I am finding plenty of wealthy guys who don't even own a knife. maybe you all are just too big, now that I'm 6 I'm starting to find guys with weapons though, so it's getting annoying. but I found this really funny guy who was size 15, had towers, and not a single defensive weapon to his name. his towers were worthless!
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: matt_the_shark on March 16, 2004, 10:13:50 PM ummm....is that possible??? :blink: :huh:
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: Drifter1 on March 16, 2004, 11:57:11 PM maybe if he saved hundreds of attack turns and went on a major attack spree...or just got lucky and found somebody else that was going on an attack run and stole his gold :cool:
Title: Which Age owned? Post by: matt_the_shark on March 17, 2004, 02:32:43 AM but....15 people!!!!!!! THAT'S CRAZY!!!
/me thinks that that guy could make a few newbies very happy :P |