Title: LOTR Post by: Galmort on December 16, 2003, 10:57:34 PM i have tickets to return of the king already. so excited :)
Title: LOTR Post by: SS on December 16, 2003, 11:07:51 PM Cool.
Did you have to pre-book them? How much did you pay? Title: LOTR Post by: LadyofLight on December 17, 2003, 02:19:11 AM 22 hours till I get to see ROTK!!!!
I'm soooooooooooooooooo excited!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I just saw this cute clip with merry and pippin and gandalf and, and I'm going to stop now before I give away spoilers... ( *psst* like LOTR and/or Elijah pictures and news? check out my website at http://welcometoelwood.100megsfree5.com (http://welcometoelwood.100megsfree5.com) . I have thousands of pictures, literally!) Title: LOTR Post by: Thamior on December 17, 2003, 03:49:59 AM I'm gonna have to wait a while to see it. Probably the weekend after this one. The only day this weekend I could see it is Sunday because of basketball and my friend who I promised to see it with (since we saw the first two together) is unavailable. Then I have Monday, Tuesday, and Christmas Eve basketball filled. Not gonna see it on Christmas. That brings us to Friday the 26th as the earliest I'll see it. Major bummer. I should get my tickets fairly soon. $9.00 a pop, but only $6.50 if you go to a matinee (at or before 6 PM).
Title: LOTR Post by: LadyofLight on December 17, 2003, 05:07:32 AM I relate, my friend can't go because he has wrestling, but he told me to go anyway, so I'm going with my Dad, who's been reading LOTR since the 70s.
Wow, expensive there. only $4.50 for a matinee here. Title: LOTR Post by: Arahen on December 17, 2003, 01:20:47 PM uh ill have to wait a long time till i can see it..*grumbles*..
Title: LOTR Post by: Thamior on December 17, 2003, 07:04:52 PM By the way, I'd appreciate it if anyone who DOES see the movie doesn't say anything about it unless you warn us. Even then I discourage it because I'll be tempted to read it even though I don't want to.
Title: LOTR Post by: Arahen on December 17, 2003, 07:05:32 PM uh thats why there are spoiler thingeys here
:) Title: LOTR Post by: Thamior on December 17, 2003, 07:51:25 PM Yeah but who reads the rules anyway? I know I don't. Plus, it's more intimidating if the people thinking about posting spoilers know for a fact that there's someone in here who doesn't wanna hear it.
Title: LOTR Post by: SS on December 17, 2003, 08:04:40 PM *SPOILER* Don't read this if you haven't seen the movie!
Quote Thamior smells! Title: LOTR Post by: Thamior on December 17, 2003, 08:24:46 PM See I just looked at it. I don't smell at the moment but maybe you should talk to me after basketball practice LOL
Title: LOTR Post by: LadyofLight on December 18, 2003, 05:54:45 AM Eek! I saw it! It rocks! OMG! But don't worry Thamior, no spoilers...yet.
Title: LOTR Post by: ns33 on December 18, 2003, 06:13:40 AM If you havent seen it yet, GO SEE IT!! You're ubercool if you see the midnight showing, cool if you see it within 24 hours of initial release, uncool if you see it 24 hours AFTER the release, and a pariah if you see it after 2 days. <_< SO GO OUT AND SEE THE MOVIE!!!
Seriously, I think it rivals The Godfather and even Star Wars. :o :o ITS THAT GOOD! Title: LOTR Post by: Arahen on December 18, 2003, 03:50:18 PM you make me jealious...(uh..:S i dont know if you write it like that...cookies) uh..lets see if its downloadable..
Title: LOTR Post by: matt_the_shark on December 18, 2003, 04:48:58 PM AAAAARRRRGGGGHHHH! I CAN'T SEE IT TIL SATURDAY! NO SPOILERS ALLOWED UNDER PENALTY OF DEATH!!
scared yet? good :D Title: LOTR Post by: Perdition on December 18, 2003, 05:01:09 PM same same. no spoilers because I will read them anyways LOL. hmmm I think I should probobly buy tickets or else i'm not gonna see it till january
Title: LOTR Post by: Everous on December 18, 2003, 11:06:58 PM man did you all pre-book tickets?
theres really no need at all...i just turned up on wednesday (first day showing) 20 minutes early at the cinema and got my seat, it was fairly empty so I got some dead center seats... and I live in Birmingham (UK) so you know...you'd expect it to be packed...but its just not Title: LOTR Post by: Saladin on December 19, 2003, 12:37:13 AM if its anything like the book then i'll know what happens
However they are taking out a main part, but cuz i'm kind i won't tell Title: LOTR Post by: underruler on December 19, 2003, 05:06:58 AM IMMA SEE IT TOMORROW!!!!
I am soooooooooo excited....I can't stop thinking about it. I didn't read the books...I tried to...and now I sound like a loser. I'll prolly try to start reading the books again during break cuz I have to read 1000 pages anyway for English...I am such a procrastinator. For example, I should be doing my chem hw now, but instead I'm here, rambling/digressing. oOo...I'm excited!!!!! I got through The Hobbit ok. Title: LOTR Post by: opperdude on December 19, 2003, 03:26:15 PM hmmm sumtimes i suspect u to be the hyper version of fire underruler, mebbe she posts with the underruler account when she had too much cafeine ;)
(don't pay attention to me...) Title: LOTR Post by: Perdition on December 19, 2003, 03:36:53 PM LOL. no. I wouldn't use 2 accounts because then my posts count would be spread out and I wouldn't like that.
Title: LOTR Post by: ns33 on December 19, 2003, 05:17:28 PM There's a LOTR triology marathon id downtown DC this weekend. 13 and a half hours of movie over a 16 hour period. I'd say my weekend just got booked... SOLID
Title: LOTR Post by: opperdude on December 19, 2003, 05:23:01 PM i might try to see it this evening, but i havent booked any tickets, i think i'll just drop by like 10 mins before a movie starts and get sum of the reservated tickets that weren't taken like i allways do (we allways get the best seats that way and i live less then 5 mins from a movie theater by bike, so doesn't reall matter if there aren't any)
Title: LOTR Post by: diskreet on December 19, 2003, 05:41:13 PM saw it wednesday... we had to pre-book tickets.. and even all of those except one showing were sold out when we got them.
it was great! i highly recommend it... and i uhh... never read the books. who has that kind of time anyway? Title: LOTR Post by: underruler on December 19, 2003, 10:28:47 PM I feel hella sorry for my friend; her teacher told her the ending when she hasn't seen the movie or even read the books.
Title: LOTR Post by: Galmort on December 19, 2003, 10:35:20 PM sorry i took so long to respond ss. i don't want to quote him either so this is from right after i made this topic...
yes. i pre-ordered tickets. had them for about a week before the showing. i saw the first showing i could right after school so at least im cool. but my brother went to the midnight showing and went to school later that day. got about one hour of sleep he said :miffed: oh yeah. It ruled!! PM me with your favorite parts :) Title: LOTR Post by: Saladin on December 20, 2003, 01:04:48 AM i haven't seen it but did they leave out the Scouring of the Shire like they said they would?
Title: LOTR Post by: evilknight on December 20, 2003, 01:37:02 AM i think so. i read somewhere that the actor who plays saramon was cut out of the movie as well.
Title: LOTR Post by: LadyofLight on December 20, 2003, 03:40:49 AM Quote i haven't seen it but did they leave out the Scouring of the Shire like they said they would? i think so. i read somewhere that the actor who plays saramon was cut out of the movie as well. Both are correct, but they had to just to squeeze everything else in. They barely fit it in the 3 hours and 20 minutes as it is. But I do know Saruman and some other material will be in the extended edition, but I think the scouring is gone permanently. Film is a different genre than books. Moviegoers tend to not stand for anything anticlimatic. Oh well. We still know it's there. Title: LOTR Post by: underruler on December 20, 2003, 04:08:08 AM I just finished watching it...oOoWHEE...is it awesome...OK...I won't say any more...PROMISE. *stabs needle in eye*
Title: LOTR Post by: evilknight on December 20, 2003, 04:14:15 AM /me is probly gonna see it tomorrow.
also, i heard that saramon will still be in the movie, but only in the dvd edition as a cut out scene. Title: LOTR Post by: LadyofLight on December 20, 2003, 10:52:20 PM Yay! I just saw it again! It's even better the second time...
Saruman is only in the extended edition, not the theatrical edition. Title: LOTR Post by: G1lbert on December 23, 2003, 07:37:18 PM Quote If you havent seen it yet, GO SEE IT!! You're ubercool if you see the midnight showing hehe.. saw the midnight showing the night of the 16th..:P *spoiler* thought the end was too corny though.. and the fight-scènes way too blurry.. didn't like the fact that legolas had to 'surf' again also.. nevertheless, great film ;) Title: LOTR Post by: Drauka on December 24, 2003, 02:21:43 AM It sucked they totally chainsawed the end of the book.
They floated more and more away from the books as they went though the movies. All those scenes that draged on that needent have could have ben cut short, and they could have put the PROPER ending into it. And at the tower in the last and this one Where the hell was wormtounge? fish peter, i hope some rabid lotr fan kills him. Title: LOTR Post by: ns33 on December 24, 2003, 02:23:16 AM I only counted four and a half endings... And after watching it 4 times, I would KNOW if all the endings were there... <_< <_< Maybe that's why the end was so long, Drauka?
Title: LOTR Post by: matt_the_shark on December 24, 2003, 02:37:59 AM Quote It sucked they totally chainsawed the end of the book. the proper ending is supposed to be in the extended version. you'll just have to waitThey floated more and more away from the books as they went though the movies. All those scenes that draged on that needent have could have ben cut short, and they could have put the PROPER ending into it. And at the tower in the last and this one Where the hell was wormtounge? fish peter, i hope some rabid lotr fan kills him. Title: LOTR Post by: evilknight on December 24, 2003, 03:55:51 AM well, if they hadnt put that stupid ass beginning there, then they might have been able to do it right. i mean, the beginning was even a bit confusing for me at first, and i had read the book b4.
Title: LOTR Post by: matt_the_shark on December 24, 2003, 03:57:15 AM don't tell me about it, because i havn't seen it yet. my plans to see it saturday were ruined because of me getting so sick :(
Title: LOTR Post by: evilknight on December 24, 2003, 04:17:51 AM bah, some fan u were.
hehe, the daily show was cracking on one of the first showings around new york, because so many people were wearing wizard hats, it was hard to see the actual movie. Title: LOTR Post by: ns33 on December 24, 2003, 04:54:13 AM I cant tell you how uncool you are if you're seeing it a week after, Matt. I think I'm just going to stop talking to you until you've seen all three movies at least twice.
Title: LOTR Post by: Thamior on December 24, 2003, 05:58:02 AM I just saw it tonight. I liked it a lot. I'm just mad that I'll never get to see another LotR movie. I didn't have to wait as long as I expected to wait before I could see it.
Title: LOTR Post by: c4rc4s on December 24, 2003, 06:09:29 AM Saw it midnight on the 17th.. or some people would say 16th, though 17th is correct ;] I prefered the book, just as I do with all books which become movies, but I still think that it was great. especially if you watch the extended versions of fellowship & two towers before going to see ROTK.. but damn your ass hurts afterwords. Anyhow, I agree it was stretched and could have been better. Whatever, I enjoyed it none the less ;) Glad to see people have taken a true interest in LOTR, i really hate it when people read a book just because they saw the movie.. it should be the other way around, but I guess it is a way of getting kids to read books they would never normally touch due to their size :)
Title: LOTR Post by: Saladin on December 27, 2003, 12:06:01 AM Quote well, if they hadnt put that stupid ass beginning there, then they might have been able to do it right. i mean, the beginning was even a bit confusing for me at first, and i had read the book b4. the beginning is Smeagol killing Deagol Title: LOTR Post by: Perdition on December 27, 2003, 12:42:22 AM smeagol is the coolest charector *me leaves only to plan the perfect moment to shove more random thoughts into your conversation*
Title: LOTR Post by: ns33 on December 27, 2003, 12:53:56 AM Watch the commentary in FOTR and TTT extended DVDs, especially with the cast and directors. The "making" on each set generally applies only to that movie, although there are clips from the others (like ROTK in TTT). JUST GET IT DAMMIT!!
Title: LOTR Post by: Perdition on December 27, 2003, 12:55:53 AM oooo my dad just got the two towers special weirdness and it came with a smeagol statue thingy. he soo cute(in a tortured soul kinda way, not in the rip his loin cloth off way)
Title: LOTR Post by: ns33 on December 27, 2003, 01:55:33 AM That edition is $20 more expensive than just the video... How big is the figure anyway, and is that all that comes with it?
Title: LOTR Post by: Perdition on December 27, 2003, 03:49:48 AM umm lemme find a tape measure. its really friggin awesome. smeagol is holding a fish :) ummm I guessing it to be about five inches tall. couldnt find a tape measure.
and it also comes with a small book and movie on gollum. and a bunch of special features disks about the making of the movie and all that stuff. Title: LOTR Post by: LadyofLight on December 27, 2003, 09:27:31 PM Yeah, I got the extended edition collector's set the day it came out. It's pretty awesome. I haven't calculated it for the TTT edition yet, but I know for the FOTR extended edition there was about 30+ hours of material besides the movie itself. Absolutely wonderful for the true LOTR geek, but probably a little too much for the casual admirer. :P
*Spoiler(kind of)* I hadn't heard that the scouring was going back in. I know other stuff, but I'm not sure about this, cuz when they returned it showed them riding in in all their armour and it was all green and stuff, and it was supposed to be when they got back. And according to some articles I read and stuff I don't think they ever planned to include it. Film is just too much of a different genre than a book. Film watchers never stand for much of a conflict after the main conflict. It's too 'anticlimatic'. Yell all you want, but PJ was making a film, not just a memorial to a book, and he made the decisions that made the best film he could, even if it meant changing things from the book. *End spoiler* And I think TTT deviated from the books even more than ROTK did, but that's just me.... Title: LOTR Post by: Thamior on December 27, 2003, 09:33:50 PM I really like what you said about Jackson making the best movie he possibly could without worrying about paying tribute to the books. I loved the movie. I'll never read the books. I couldn't care any less if the movie was inaccurate to the books. And I hate when people say stuff like "Oh, the books were so much better than the movie," when they know you haven't read the books, just so they can feel superior. IT'S NOT MY FAULT I CAN'T READ IF NOBODY EVER TAUGHT ME! :( The movie...is always better than the book. :P
Title: LOTR Post by: ns33 on December 27, 2003, 09:40:29 PM Quote And I think TTT deviated from the books even more than ROTK did, but that's just me.... Depends what you mean from "deviate" because there's tons of different factors that are tossed into the work place when you're going from book to film. Yes, there will be added scenes that never happened in the book, and yes, there will be important scenes from the book deleted in the movie. But the point of the MOVIE is for the viewer to enjoy it in context of the book. Important scenes from the book that are incorporated into the movie might kill the movie, which defeats the point of making a film in the first place. Check disk 3 of TTT, I think its chapter 13 or 14 where they talk about book vs film. Title: LOTR Post by: KILLUMALL on December 28, 2003, 03:42:10 AM heres a spoiler THEY ALL DIE WHEN ALIENS COME AND EAT THERE BRAINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL no i saw the movie and ill only say go out right now dont even finsih reading this just leave and see it :sheep: vs :ph34r:
I changed spoiner to spoiler for you :) Title: LOTR Post by: opperdude on December 28, 2003, 02:05:34 PM oooh i saw it yesterday night!!! :) :) me liked, alot :)
i do wanna know what the different ending is compared to the book tho Title: LOTR Post by: Arahen on December 28, 2003, 03:43:19 PM ooh i am prolly going to see it tomoz..and first the first 2 movies..wiehie :sheep:
Title: LOTR Post by: Saladin on January 02, 2004, 07:25:01 PM so what were your favorite parts?
Title: LOTR Post by: mole on January 02, 2004, 07:29:11 PM personal verdict: wow
Title: LOTR Post by: Rug on January 02, 2004, 07:29:44 PM Quote so what were your favorite parts? Cavalry Charges; all 3 of em. Eowyn vs Witch King, mainly because the Witch King is cool. Minas Morgul. Title: LOTR Post by: mole on January 02, 2004, 07:36:52 PM its hardly a versus though is it :( its fun and the way she does it but it doesnt last long
Title: LOTR Post by: Rug on January 02, 2004, 07:51:10 PM Lasts a short paragraph in the book.
Title: LOTR Post by: mole on January 02, 2004, 07:55:15 PM the book doesnt interest me now, im sur eif i read it before maybe but, i know the beggining, i know the end, details dont matter once youve seen nearly 12 hours of film
Title: LOTR Post by: Saladin on January 02, 2004, 08:23:35 PM I thought the fight between Eowyn and the Witchking was not as exciting as in the book. I liked Shelob and i liked the charge of the Rohirrim
Title: LOTR Post by: mole on January 03, 2004, 12:54:14 AM im with matt all the charges were cool, and loved all the fight scenes.
the appearence and graphics of the eagles was beautiful though Title: LOTR Post by: Perdition on January 03, 2004, 01:32:19 AM just saw it. awesome really awesome. they did such a great job on all of that. my brother and dad were talking about how they left some important stuff out but since I didnt read the books its perfect for me :)
oh yeah and viggo is a sexy beatch. just thought I'd toss that in there. and in white font so you are less likely to see it. Title: LOTR Post by: Rug on January 03, 2004, 10:36:11 AM Every girl I know thinks Viggo Mortenson is a sexy bitch. Including my mum. :blink:.
Title: LOTR Post by: Perdition on January 03, 2004, 10:38:30 AM mmm he has that perfect facial hair(on LOTR) not to short but not to long. and those super sexy eyes *melts onto floor* everyone I know likes mr. Bloom. but he is too meua. while viggo is just mmmmmmm. Am i still talking?
Title: LOTR Post by: RipperRoo on January 03, 2004, 11:39:35 AM Isnt he 50ish?
Title: LOTR Post by: Perdition on January 03, 2004, 11:48:16 AM 45. but older guys are sexah.
Title: LOTR Post by: opperdude on January 03, 2004, 01:40:00 PM which one is viggo?
ow and i liked the part where all the orcs slaughtered each other :P altho it was not really in the movie, but twas quite a good idea to solve the problem like that, reminds me a bit of monthy pythons search for the holy grail, altho it's completely different bah Title: LOTR Post by: mole on January 03, 2004, 03:28:17 PM LOL speaking of monty python i had this great mental image of aragorn walking up to the black gate and asking for the dark lord of what ever and either john clease or one of the french knights pops over the top and have a conversation...yes
anyone notice Aragorns dips into irish accent? pretty wierd, particulary at the black gate Title: LOTR Post by: Saladin on January 03, 2004, 04:57:14 PM some of my friends were saying that Frodo seemed to have a thing for Sam but in the book it just is about friendship. What do you guys think?
Title: LOTR Post by: opperdude on January 03, 2004, 05:09:56 PM ehm well yeah he should love the guy, sam is the real hero who saves his ass all the time imo... (no spoiler danger in here rite?)
Title: LOTR Post by: RipperRoo on January 03, 2004, 06:12:35 PM Quote LOL speaking of monty python i had this great mental image of aragorn walking up to the black gate and asking for the dark lord of what ever and either john clease or one of the french knights pops over the top and have a conversation...yes Yea, I noticed the Irish accent at the gate. anyone notice Aragorns dips into irish accent? pretty wierd, particulary at the black gate Title: LOTR Post by: mole on January 03, 2004, 06:36:13 PM RB did u hafta say it :( it kept seeming like the one was coming onto the other every time they were on the screen at the same time :miffed:
Title: LOTR Post by: Perdition on January 03, 2004, 11:29:30 PM yeah towards the end I had a great mental conversation going between those 2. i started laughing and got a couple of looks from the people around me.
Viggo is aragorn. Title: LOTR Post by: Saladin on January 04, 2004, 12:35:34 AM it was funny how they were subliminably(or mostly not) hitting on each other
Title: LOTR Post by: ns33 on January 04, 2004, 01:13:29 AM I cant believe people have fetishes on a movie... It surpasses my thought capabilities :miffed:
Title: LOTR Post by: Perdition on January 04, 2004, 02:01:45 AM NS dont tell em you dont have fur fetishes and those are cartoons
|